Uninformative Patents

24 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2018 Last revised: 11 Mar 2018

See all articles by Sean B. Seymore

Sean B. Seymore

Vanderbilt University - Law School

Date Written: December 27, 2017


It is a bedrock principle of patent law that an inventor need not know or understand how or why an invention works. The patent statute simply requires that the inventor explain how to make and use the invention. But explaining how to make and use something without understanding how or why it works yields patents with uninformative disclosures. Their teaching function is limited; someone who wants to understand or figure out the underlying scientific principles must turn elsewhere. This limited disclosure rule does not align with the norms of science and tends to make patent documents a less robust form of technical literature. This Essay explores the contours of the rule, the policy tradeoffs, and the broader implications for the patent system.

Keywords: Patent, Disclosure, Enablement, Patentability, Knowledge, Innovation, PTO, USPTO

JEL Classification: O31, O32, O33, O34, O38, O40, O48, K39

Suggested Citation

Seymore, Sean B., Uninformative Patents (December 27, 2017). Houston Law Review, Vol. 55, 2017, pp. 377-399, Vanderbilt Law Research Paper, 18-23, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3122713

Sean B. Seymore (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics