Anti-Innovation Norms

72 Pages Posted: 16 Feb 2018  

Date Written: February 13, 2018

Abstract

Intellectual property (IP) scholars have recently turned their attention to social norms-informal rules that emerge from and are enforced by non-hierarchically organized social forces-as a promising way to spur innovation in communities as diverse as the fashion industry and the open source software movement. The narrative that has emerged celebrates social norms' ability to solve IP's free-rider problem without incurring IP's costs.

But this account does not fully consider the dark side of social norms. In fact, certain social norms, when over-enforced, can create substantial barriers to the most socially beneficial creative pursuits. Because intellectual property scholars have left unexplored how social norms can hinder innovation in this way, the harm they cause has gone unmitigated.

This Article sheds light on the dark side of innovation norms. It coins the term "anti-innovation norms" to label these counterproductive social forces. Using the double lens of sociology and psychology, it gives a full theoretical account of three types of anti-innovation norms: research priority, methodology, and evaluation norms-all of which interfere with socially beneficial boundary-crossing innovation.

Our elucidation of anti-innovation norms has both theoretical and policy implications. On the theory side, it suggests that IP scholars to date have been too focused on addressing the free-rider problem. This has caused them to overlook other barriers to innovation, like those posed by the set of anti-innovation norms we describe here. This focus on free-riding may also help explain why innovation and norms scholars have paid little attention to debates within the broader literature on law and social norms concerned with identifying situations in which social norms are welfare-reducing. On the policy side, it points to innovation dilemmas that IP is not fully equipped to solve. While changes to the IP doctrines of attribution and fair use in copyright and non-obviousness in patent law can counteract anti-innovation norms at the margin, a comprehensive solution requires innovation scholars to broaden their vision beyond the IP toolkit. We take the first steps in this direction, proposing a number of interventions, including novel funding regimes and tax credits.

Keywords: patent, copyright, intellectual property, social norms, IP norms, law and economics, boundary-crossing, interdisciplinarity

JEL Classification: K10, K30

Suggested Citation

Plamondon Bair, Stephanie and Pedraza-Farina, Laura G., Anti-Innovation Norms (February 13, 2018). Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming; Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 18-05; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 18-06. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3123770 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3123770

Stephanie Plamondon Bair

Brigham Young University J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )

430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Laura G. Pedraza-Farina (Contact Author)

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

600 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
98
rank
246,140
Abstract Views
611
PlumX