U.S. Civil Litigation and International Terrorism

35 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2002

See all articles by Jack Landman Goldsmith

Jack Landman Goldsmith

Harvard Law School

Ryan Goodman

New York University School of Law

Abstract

Since September 11, the United States has mobilized enormous military, political, and legal resources to combat the threat of terrorism. This paper examines one component of these efforts: civil suits for acts of terrorism. We analyze current U.S. law governing civil actions against terrorists, consider the strengths and weaknesses of such actions, and propose alternative reforms. The paper proceeds in four parts. Part I describes the central pivot around which the doctrinal issues turn - the problem of state action. Part II analyzes U.S. law governing civil litigation against alleged terrorists who do not implicate the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIA"). Part III analyzes U.S. law governing civil litigation against alleged terrorists who do implicate the FSIA. Part IV discusses the policy tradeoffs of civil actions against terrorists, considers the strengths and weaknesses of current law in light of these policy issues, and analyze several legal reforms.

Suggested Citation

Goldsmith, Jack Landman and Goodman, Ryan, U.S. Civil Litigation and International Terrorism. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=312451 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.312451

Jack Landman Goldsmith (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Ryan Goodman

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
405
Abstract Views
2,617
rank
78,904
PlumX Metrics