Reigniting the Lamp: The Case for Including People Who Are Blind or Deaf As Jurors

27 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2018

See all articles by Brock Budworth

Brock Budworth

University of Canberra - University of Canberra, Students

Trevor Ryan

University of Canberra

Lorana Bartels

Australian National University (ANU) - ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods

Date Written: October 2017

Abstract

This article presents the case for including people who are blind or deaf as jurors. It does so in the context of the High Court’s recent decision in Lyons v Queensland [2016] HCA 38. We also consider the impact of the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD), to which Australia is a signatory, the steps taken in the United States to accommodate deaf and blind jurors, and recent law reform and legislative developments in Australia.

Keywords: Australia, Jurors, Deaf, Blind, Convention on the Rights of People With Disabilities (CRPD)

Suggested Citation

Budworth, Brock and Ryan, Trevor and Bartels, Lorana, Reigniting the Lamp: The Case for Including People Who Are Blind or Deaf As Jurors (October 2017). University of Western Australia Law Review, 42(2): 29-55, October 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3124749

Brock Budworth

University of Canberra - University of Canberra, Students ( email )

Australia

Trevor Ryan

University of Canberra ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601
Australia

Lorana Bartels (Contact Author)

Australian National University (ANU) - ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods ( email )

Beryl Rawson Building (13)
Canberra, ACT 0200
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
341
PlumX Metrics