Justice Luck and the Law of Negligence

20 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2018

See all articles by Mark F. Grady

Mark F. Grady

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: February 12, 2018

Abstract

Juries possess the power to forgive even obvious negligence and frequently exercise it. Judges and courts facilitate this disposition of cases and regularly affirm juries' decisions to forgive negligence. This practice creates a problem for corrective justice theories of negligence, which commonly assert that the purpose of negligence law is to repair harm. This reparative purpose is not achieved in the many cases in which juries forgive negligence. In addition, juries impose negligence liability on many acts and omissions that are not wrongs in any moral sense. Negligence liability is best understood not as a moral system, but as a "stochastic tax." Someone whose negligence has been forgiven by a jury has experienced "justice luck."

Keywords: Negligence, Justice Luck, Compliance Luck, Breach of Duty, Legal Precedent, Forgiveness, Stochastic Tax, Durable Precaution, Nondurable Precaution, Precaution Plans, Cost-Benefit Analysis

JEL Classification: K13, K40, K41, K42

Suggested Citation

Grady, Mark F., Justice Luck and the Law of Negligence (February 12, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3124996 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124996

Mark F. Grady (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-1856 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
75
Abstract Views
421
rank
324,251
PlumX Metrics