Why Do Prosecutors Say Anything? The Case of Corporate Crime

36 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2018 Last revised: 28 Mar 2018

Date Written: February 19, 2018

Abstract

Criminal procedure law does not require prosecutors to speak outside of court. Professional regulations and norms discourage and sometimes prohibit prosecutors from doing so. Litigation often rewards strategic and tactical maintenance of the element of surprise. Institutional incentives encourage bureaucrats, especially those not bound by procedural requirements of administrative law, to decline to commit themselves to future action. In the always exceptional field of corporate crime, however, the Department of Justice and federal line prosecutors have developed practices of signaling and describing their exercise of discretion through detailed press releases, case filings, and policy documents. This contribution to a symposium dealing with secrecy in enforcement of securities laws develops causal explanations for this prosecutorial behavior and argues, perhaps counterintuitively, that federal prosecutors' disclosure of details about their settlement of corporate enforcement actions is more publicly valuable than their issuance of policies and guidelines.

Suggested Citation

Buell, Samuel W., Why Do Prosecutors Say Anything? The Case of Corporate Crime (February 19, 2018). 96 North Carolina Law Review 823 (2018); Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2018-21. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3126283

Samuel W. Buell (Contact Author)

Duke University School of Law ( email )

210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7193 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
340
rank
355,097
PlumX Metrics