Across-Sample Incomparability of R2s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over Time

GSIA-CMU Working Paper No. 2001-9

38 Pages Posted: 31 May 2002

See all articles by Zhaoyang Gu

Zhaoyang Gu

Chinese University of Hong Kong - School of Accountancy

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: March 2007

Abstract

Given the increasing popularity of across-sample R2 comparisons in accounting research, this paper illustrates why the regression R2s are incomparable across samples and the general nature of this problem. The regression residual dispersion with proper control for scale is proposed as the alternative measure of explanatory power for across-sample comparisons. In market-on-accounting variable regressions, this measure can be conveniently interpreted as the degree of accounting-based pricing errors and be used as a measure of value relevance of accounting information. As an application, the issue of over-time value relevance changes is re-visited. In contrast to prior mixed findings based on the R2 measure, a decline of value relevance since the early 1970's is robustly detected using the alternative measure.

Keywords: Econometric models, R2, residuals, pricing errors, value relevance

JEL Classification: C51, G10, M41

Suggested Citation

Gu, Zhaoyang, Across-Sample Incomparability of R2s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over Time (March 2007). GSIA-CMU Working Paper No. 2001-9, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=312761 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.312761

Zhaoyang Gu (Contact Author)

Chinese University of Hong Kong - School of Accountancy ( email )

Shatin, N.T.
Hong Kong

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
962
Abstract Views
5,403
rank
34,911
PlumX Metrics