Self-Regulation vs State Regulation: Evidence from Cinema Age Restrictions

45 Pages Posted: 4 Mar 2018

See all articles by Ryan Lampe

Ryan Lampe

California State University, East Bay - Department of Economics

Shaun McRae

ITAM, Centro de Investigación Económica

Date Written: February 22, 2018

Abstract

Motion picture ratings systems classify a movie’s violent and sexual content and potentially require theater owners to restrict entry to minors. We study the impact of self-regulation on the leniency of ratings using cross-country variation in the level of restrictions applied to 1,810 movies that were released in 34 countries or provinces between 2000 and 2011. While ratings in most countries are issued by state-regulated bodies, ratings in six countries are issued by agencies created and operated by the film industry. Our data indicate that these self-regulatory organizations issue more lenient ratings to films with strong teenage appeal, which we demonstrate are most affected by restrictive ratings. Compared to movies with low teenage appeal, movies with high teenage appeal are available to audiences 2.6 months younger on average in countries with a self-regulated ratings agency.

Keywords: self-regulation, movies

JEL Classification: L51

Suggested Citation

Lampe, Ryan and McRae, Shaun, Self-Regulation vs State Regulation: Evidence from Cinema Age Restrictions (February 22, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128622 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128622

Ryan Lampe (Contact Author)

California State University, East Bay - Department of Economics ( email )

25800 Carlos Bee Blvd.
Hayward, CA 94542
United States

Shaun McRae

ITAM, Centro de Investigación Económica ( email )

Camino a Santa Teresa No. 930
Col. Héroes de Padierna
Ciudad de México
Mexico

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
176
PlumX