Constitutional Dialogue in the Case of Legislative Omissions: Who Fills the Legislative Gap?

21 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2018

See all articles by Sarah Verstraelen

Sarah Verstraelen

University of Antwerp - Faculty of Law

Date Written: February 9, 2018

Abstract

In approximately 108 judgments, the Belgian Constitutional Court has confirmed the presence of a legislative lacuna. These judgements incite a constitutional dialogue, first and foremost with the legislator, especially in those cases where the Court explicitly emphasizes that only the legislator can amend an unconstitutional lack of legislation. Although the case law of the Constitutional Court regarding these legislative omissions has already been largely explored, the actual legislative reaction has not received much attention. Consequently, in this contribution the legislative response to these ‘lacuna judgements’ is examined. The study by Meuwese and Snel regarding the concept of constitutional dialogue offers an excellent starting point to analyse the interaction between the Constitutional Court and the legislator. The lack of any regular or systematic follow-up or specific parliamentary proceeding to comply with the case law of the Constitutional Court, however, has complicated the collection of empirical data.

Keywords: constitutional dialogue, constitutional review, legislative omissions, legislative reaction, empirical research

Suggested Citation

Verstraelen, Sarah, Constitutional Dialogue in the Case of Legislative Omissions: Who Fills the Legislative Gap? (February 9, 2018). Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 61-81, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128772

Sarah Verstraelen (Contact Author)

University of Antwerp - Faculty of Law ( email )

Prinsstraat 13
Antwerp
Belgium

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
11
Abstract Views
90
PlumX Metrics