Cumulative Finality

64 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2018 Last revised: 30 Aug 2018

See all articles by Bryan Lammon

Bryan Lammon

University of Toledo - College of Law

Date Written: February 26, 2018

Abstract

A proper notice of appeal is a necessary first step in most federal appeals. But federal litigants sometimes file their notice of appeal early, before district court proceedings have ended. When those proceedings finally end and no new notice is filed, the law of cumulative finality determines what effect—if any—the premature notice has. Sometimes the notice is effective and the appeal proceeds as normal. Sometimes it’s not, and litigants lose their right to appeal.

At least, that’s how the law of cumulative finality looks from a distance. Up close, the courts of appeals are hopelessly divided on matters of cumulative finality. They disagree on what law governs cumulative finality issues—whether they are governed solely by Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(2) or also by a common-law cumulative finality doctrine that preceded the rule—and under what conditions a premature notice of appeal is saved. Three distinct approaches to cumulative finality have emerged, resulting in a deep circuit split. To make matters worse, decisions within several of the circuits have applied different approaches, resulting in intracircuit divides.

This Article offers a fix. Neither the text of the Rules of Appellate Procedure nor their history provide a clear cumulative finality rule. But looking to the practicalities of the issue suggests allowing a subsequent judgment to save any prematurely filed notice of appeal. Doing so imposes few costs while preserving litigants’ right to appeal.

The current cumulative finality mess illuminates a larger issue with the appellate jurisdiction literature and its attendant reform efforts. The literature has long maligned the unnecessary complexity and uncertainty of the entire federal appellate jurisdiction regime and advocated reform. But most of that literature focuses on only one part of that regime—appeals before a final judgment. Equally important are issues with determining when district court proceedings have ended and parties thus have a right to appeal. Cumulative finality is only one piece in this other aspect of appellate jurisdiction. There are more. Successful reform might require establishing a new, clearer point at which parties have a right to appeal. So this other aspect of appellate jurisdiction needs similar attention if reform is to succeed.

Keywords: appellate procedure, civil procedure, appellate jurisdiction, federal courts, federal jurisdiction

Suggested Citation

Lammon, Bryan, Cumulative Finality (February 26, 2018). 52 Georgia Law Review 767 (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3130476

Bryan Lammon (Contact Author)

University of Toledo - College of Law ( email )

2801 W. Bancroft Street
Toledo, OH 43606
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
255
PlumX Metrics