Download This PaperAmicus Brief of the Houston Intellectual Property Law Association in Support of Neither Party, 16-1011, WesternGeco L.L.C. v. ION Geophysical Corp.
24 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2018 Last revised: 16 Mar 2020
Date Written: March 2, 2018
Abstract
In WesternGeco L.L.C. v. ION Geophysical Corp., the Supreme Court will consider whether lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f). The Houston Intellectual Property Law Association filed this brief on behalf of neither party.
Keywords: extraterritoriality, patents, RJR Nabisco, 271(f)
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kumar, Sapna and Ahmed, Ifti, Amicus Brief of the Houston Intellectual Property Law Association in Support of Neither Party, 16-1011, WesternGeco L.L.C. v. ION Geophysical Corp. (March 2, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3133378 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3133378
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.