Does It Pay to Follow Anomalies Research? Machine Learning Approach with International Evidence

52 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2018 Last revised: 17 Sep 2023

See all articles by Ondrej Tobek

Ondrej Tobek

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Economics

Martin Hronec

Charles University in Prague - Institute of Economic Studies

Date Written: May 1, 2018

Abstract

We study out-of-sample returns on 153 anomalies in equities documented in the academic literature. We show that machine learning techniques that aggregate all the anomalies into one mispricing signal are profitable around the globe and survive on a liquid universe of stocks. We investigate the value of international evidence for selection of quantitative strategies that outperform out-of-sample. Past performance of quantitative strategies in regions other than the United States does not help to pick out-of-sample winning strategies in the U.S. Past evidence from the U.S., however, captures most of the return predictability outside the U.S.

Keywords: Anomalies, International Finance, Machine Learning, Neural Network, Random Forest.

JEL Classification: G11, G12, G15

Suggested Citation

Tobek, Ondrej and Hronec, Martin, Does It Pay to Follow Anomalies Research? Machine Learning Approach with International Evidence (May 1, 2018). Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 58, No. 100588, 2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3133993 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3133993

Ondrej Tobek (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Economics ( email )

Sidgwick Avenue
Cambridge, CB3 9DD
United Kingdom

Martin Hronec

Charles University in Prague - Institute of Economic Studies ( email )

Opletalova 26
Praha 1, 11000
Czech Republic

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
623
Abstract Views
2,789
Rank
75,100
PlumX Metrics