A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation

61 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2018  

Frank A. Pasquale

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project

Date Written: March 6, 2018

Abstract

For many legal futurists, attorneys’ work is a prime target for automation. They view the legal practice of most businesses as algorithmic: data (such as facts) are transformed into outputs (agreements or litigation stances) via application of set rules. These technophiles promote substituting computer code for contracts and descriptions of facts now written by humans. They point to early successes in legal automation as proof of concept. TurboTax has helped millions of Americans file taxes, and algorithms have taken over certain aspects of stock trading. Corporate efforts to “formalize legal code” may bring new efficiencies in areas of practice characterized by both legal and factual clarity.

However, legal automation can also elide or exclude important human values, necessary improvisations, and irreducibly deliberative governance. Due process, appeals, and narratively intelligible explanation from persons, for persons, depend on forms of communication that are not reducible to software. Language is constitutive of these aspects of law. To preserve accountability and a humane legal order, these reasons must be expressed in language by a responsible person. This basic requirement for legitimacy limits legal automation in several contexts, including corporate compliance, property recordation, and contracting. A robust and ethical legal profession respects the flexibility and subtlety of legal language as a prerequisite for a just and accountable social order. It ensures a rule of persons, not machines.

Keywords: legal technology, legaltech, regtech, fintech, jurisprudence, rule of law, rule by law, machine learning, big data, predictive analytics, algorithms, artificial intelligence, AI, ML, data mining, jurisprudence, political economy, law and technology, affordance

Suggested Citation

Pasquale, Frank A., A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation (March 6, 2018). George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming; U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20018-08. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3135549

Frank A. Pasquale (Contact Author)

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )

500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States
410-706-4820 (Phone)
410-706-0407 (Fax)

Yale University - Yale Information Society Project ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
902
rank
23,190
Abstract Views
5,460
PlumX