Recovering Wagner v. International Railway Company

47 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2018 Last revised: 9 Mar 2018

Kenneth S. Abraham

University of Virginia School of Law

G. Edward White

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: March 7, 2018

Abstract

Benjamin Cardozo's 1921 opinion for the Court of Appeals of New York in Wagner v. International Railway Co. has been called the "seminal case imposing liability on a tortfeasor for harm suffered by a person who came to the rescue of another." The case is indeed seminal, but it did not become so on its own. Rather, in Wagner, Cardozo took a question on which there already was substantial precedent, and re-answered the question in a new, inimitable, and memorable way. As Cardozo put it in a now-canonical phrase, "Danger invites rescue." Then, precisely by virtue of the way Cardozo did this re-answering, Wagner became the leading decision on the subject. In this Article we analyze Cardozo's accomplishment, and show how his opinion in Wagner foreshadowed what he later accomplished in his even more celebrated opinion in Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.

Keywords: torts, negligence, rescue, proximate cause

JEL Classification: K13

Suggested Citation

Abraham, Kenneth S. and White, G. Edward, Recovering Wagner v. International Railway Company (March 7, 2018). Touro Law Review, Forthcoming; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2018-16. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3135914

Kenneth S. Abraham (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-3616 (Phone)
434-982-2845 (Fax)

G. Edward White

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
(434) 924-3455 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.virginia.edu/lawweb/faculty.nsf/PrF

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
35
Abstract Views
194
PlumX