IMF Programs: Who is Chosen and What are the Effects?
50 Pages Posted: 24 May 2002 Last revised: 18 Dec 2022
Date Written: May 2002
Abstract
IMF lending practices respond to economic conditions but are also sensitive to political-economy variables. Specifically, the sizes and frequencies of loans are influenced by a country's presence at the Fund, as measured by the country's share of quotas and professional staff. IMF lending is also sensitive to a country's political and economic proximity to some major shareholding countries of the IMF -- the United States, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. We measured political proximity by voting patterns in the United Nations and economic proximity by bilateral trading volumes. These results are of considerable interest for their own sake but also provide instrumental variables for estimating the effects of IMF lending on economic performance. Instrumental estimates indicate that the size of IMF lending is insignificantly related to economic growth in the contemporaneous five-year period but has a significantly negative effect in the subsequent five years.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Determinants of Fund Financial Arrangements
By Malcolm Knight and Julio A. Santaella
-
Does IMF Financing Result in Moral Hazard?
By Timothy Lane and Steven Phillips
-
Does the IMF Cause Moral Hazard and Political Business Cycles? Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher and Roland Vaubel
-
The Macroeconomic Effects of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs: An Empirical Assessment
-
Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach
By Allan Drazen
-
Debt Relief for Low-Income Countries and the Hipc Initiative
By Anthony Boote and Kamau Thugge