Contract, Mechanism Design, and Technological Detail
UCSD Economics Discussion Paper No. 2002-04
40 Pages Posted: 30 May 2002
Date Written: January 2002
Abstract
This paper develops a theoretical framework for studying contract and enforcement in settings of complete, but unverifiable, information. The main point of the paper is that the consideration of renegotiation necessitates formal examination of other technological constraints, especially those having to do with the timing and nature of inalienable productive decisions. The main technical contributions include (a) results that characterize of the sets of implementable state-contingent payoffs under various assumptions about renegotiation opportunities, and (b) a result establishing conditions under which, when trading opportunities are durable and trade decisions are reversible, stationary contracts are optimal. The analysis refutes the validity of the "mechanism design with ex post renegotiation" program, it demonstrates the validity of other mechanism design models in dynamic environments, and it highlights the need for a more structured game-theoretic framework.
Keywords: implementation, renegotiation, investment, hold-up
JEL Classification: C70, D74, K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Courts of Law and Unforeseen Contingencies
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...
-
The Law and Economics of Costly Contracting
By Alan Schwartz and Joel Watson
-
Courts of Law and Unforeseen Contingencies
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...
-
Courts of Law and Unforeseen Contingencies (Second Version)
By Leonardo Felli, Luca Anderlini, ...
-
Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...
-
Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...