Conspicuous Philanthropy: A Response

American University Law Review Forum, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2018

13 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2018  

Joel S. Newman

Wake Forest University - School of Law

Date Written: March 12, 2018

Abstract

In his Article, Professor Drennan notes that naming rights often have significant value. Therefore, he reasons that, when charitable contributions are made, the value of such naming rights should be subtracted from the amount of the contribution. Only the excess should be a tax-deductible contribution, and the burden should be on the donor to show that such an excess exists. To make this proposal work, there must be a way to determine (1) which categories of naming rights might be significant benefits; and (2) how such benefits can be valued. As to the first, Professor Drennan has given us some examples of some rights that are clearly significant, and some rights that are clearly not. However, there are a lot of rights in between that should be addressed. As to the second, in the noncommercial context, valuation is impossible. Therefore, donors will fail to meet their burden, and their contributions will be nondeductible. To solve this problem, as Professor Drennan suggests, donors and donees will agree at the outset on the value of the naming rights. However, such agreed valuations will also serve as liquidated damages, making it easier for donees to renege. As a result, donors will probably limit the duration of their naming rights in the first place. This result would be a step forward.

Keywords: Charitable contributions, naming rights, tax, tax-deductible contribution

Suggested Citation

Newman, Joel S., Conspicuous Philanthropy: A Response (March 12, 2018). American University Law Review Forum, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3138876

Joel S. Newman (Contact Author)

Wake Forest University - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
20
Abstract Views
92
PlumX