Who Conducts Oversight? Bill-Writers, Lifers, and Nail-Biters

22 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2018 Last revised: 28 Aug 2021

See all articles by Brian D. Feinstein

Brian D. Feinstein

University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School

Date Written: 2018


The landmark Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 charges Congress, through its standing committees, to “exercise continuous watchfulness” over the executive branch. Yet committees differ markedly in their performance of this responsibility; the modal House committee convenes no oversight hearings in the typical year, while other committees hold many dozens of hearings. This Article compares the characteristics of committee chairs that pursue oversight vigorously with those that do not. Surprisingly, I find that chairs’ previous prosecutorial or other legal experience has no discernable connection with oversight activity. Instead, committees that engage in frequent oversight tend to be chaired by productive lawmakers (“bill-writers”), members with long tenures in office (“lifers”), and members facing competitive elections (“nailbiters”). Should congressional leaders desire to increase their branch’s role in governance after the passage of laws, they ought to encourage members with these characteristics to chair committees.

Keywords: Congress, oversight, committees, committee chairs

JEL Classification: H11

Suggested Citation

Feinstein, Brian D., Who Conducts Oversight? Bill-Writers, Lifers, and Nail-Biters (2018). University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 845, Wayne Law Review, Vol. 64, pp. 127-148 (2018 Symposium), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3142295 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3142295

Brian D. Feinstein (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School ( email )

3641 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6365
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics