Perform Better, or Else: Academic Probation, Public Praise, and Students Decision-Making

Posted: 17 Mar 2018 Last revised: 17 Nov 2019

See all articles by Nicholas Wright

Nicholas Wright

Florida Gulf Coast University - Lutgert College of Business

Date Written: November 15, 2019

Abstract

This paper examines how college initiatives that ascribe public recognition or written reprimand to a set standard of academic performance impact students' decision-making. Many colleges utilize programs such as the Dean’s list and academic probation policies as mediums to encourage student success. These policies impose a cost on affected students through the potential loss of acquired benefits or the threat of expulsion for failing to perform above the established standard in future semesters. Using the regression discontinuity design, I find that students who are named to the Dean’s list or put on academic probation during their first year improved their subsequent academic performance. To achieve this improvement, students on the Dean's list are induced into selecting courses and instructors that are more likely to result in higher letter grades and those bounded by the academic probation policy are likely to switch majors and employ a maximin strategy for expected grades when choosing courses.

Keywords: Public Praise, Academic Probation, Effort, Course Selection, Major, GPA

JEL Classification: D84, I20, I21, I23, J01

Suggested Citation

Wright, Nicholas, Perform Better, or Else: Academic Probation, Public Praise, and Students Decision-Making (November 15, 2019). Labour Economics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3142416 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3142416

Nicholas Wright (Contact Author)

Florida Gulf Coast University - Lutgert College of Business ( email )

10485 FGCU Blvd S
Fort Myers, FL 33965
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.fgcu.edu/cob/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
775
PlumX Metrics