Amnesties in Strasbourg

(2018) 38 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 451

24 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2018 Last revised: 28 Mar 2019

See all articles by Miles Jackson

Miles Jackson

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 7, 2018

Abstract

This article concerns the permissibility of amnesties under the ECHR. It argues that when an amnesty case comes to Strasbourg, as it probably will, there is a good chance that the Court will make a serious error. That error will be to hold that the Convention requires the prosecution of the gravest human rights abuses in all circumstances – it will be to invalidate the amnesty. In part, such an approach will likely be informed by an assumption that each of the duties that flows from an absolute right is itself absolute. That assumption, combined with the way that the Court has specified the prosecutorial duty, would prevent the Court from taking into account powerful countervailing interests in play during peace negotiations. These countervailing interests mean that a claim that amnesties for the gravest wrongs are always impermissible is unsustainable.

Keywords: Amnesty, Torture, ECHR, Peace, Absolute Rights

Suggested Citation

Jackson, Miles, Amnesties in Strasbourg (June 7, 2018). (2018) 38 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 451. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3143394 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3143394

Miles Jackson (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mansfield Road
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 4AU
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
180
Abstract Views
701
rank
167,190
PlumX Metrics