The Anti-Blackstonians

114 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2018

Date Written: March 21, 2018

Abstract

The writings of four authors — Daniel Epps, Larry Laudan (writing alone and with Ronald J. Allen) and Paul G. Casell — related to the Blackstone principle or the Blackstone ratio are analyzed and criticized herein. Their writings are labeled anti-Blackstonian because in my view view their programs would (1) seriously weaken defendants’ rights, (2) not reduce wrongful convictions, and (3) not enhance public safety. This critique is written from the context of the innocence movement, analyses of criminologists related to the Blackstone ratio, and a deeply flawed criminal justice system.

Keywords: Wrongful Conviction, Blackstone Ratio, Blackstone Principle, Innocence Movement, Incapacitation

Suggested Citation

Zalman, Marvin, The Anti-Blackstonians (March 21, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3145185 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3145185

Marvin Zalman (Contact Author)

Wayne State University ( email )

Department of Physiology, Wayne State University
Detroit, MI 48202
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
Abstract Views
750
Rank
523,933
PlumX Metrics