A Brief Reply to Professor Cassell

25 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2018

Date Written: March 21, 2018

Abstract

My reply to Paul G. Cassell, Tradeoffs Between Wrongful Convictions and Wrongful Acquittals: Analyzing the Risks and Avoiding the Risks, which is in part a response to my article. The Anti-Blackstonians asserts (1) that all legal scholarship reflects the ideological predilections of authors and thus that our exchange should be evaluated in light of Prof. Cassell’s conservative and my liberal world views; (2) that many of Prof. Cassell’s assertions about correcting wrongful convictions are exaggerated, without scientific foundation, or wrong; (3) that Cassell’s support for Dr. Laudan’s ideas are misguided and if implemented would exacerbate the miseries of mass incarceration, and (4) a narrow focus on wrongful convictions should not hide the point that such injustices emanate from a deeply flawed criminal justice system.

Keywords: wrongful conviction, ideology

Suggested Citation

Zalman, Marvin, A Brief Reply to Professor Cassell (March 21, 2018). Seton Hall Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3145194 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3145194

Marvin Zalman (Contact Author)

Wayne State University ( email )

Department of Physiology, Wayne State University
Detroit, MI 48202
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
427
Rank
546,005
PlumX Metrics