Updating the Procedural Law of Judicial Review of Administrative Action

University of British Columbia Law Review (Forthcoming)

University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 25/2018

23 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2018 Last revised: 10 Apr 2018

Paul Daly

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 21, 2018

Abstract

The substantive law of judicial review of administrative action has grown in leaps and bounds in recent decades. However, the procedural law has lagged behind. On issues such as the content of the record on judicial review applications, the extent to which administrative decision-makers can participate in judicial reviews of their decisions, superior court review of federal prison decisions and tribunals’ capacity to reconsider their decisions, Canadian courts have recently come under pressure to update the procedural law to bring it into line with the substantive law. I develop a set of considerations which courts ought to keep in mind when updating the procedural law. Courts should not automatically assume that the procedural law of judicial review must move in lockstep with its substance. Wary of the dynamic relationship between procedure and substance in the common law tradition, mindful of constitutional fundamentals and sensitive to the need to develop the common law in an incremental fashion, consistent with those values that are immanent in the law, the judges should exercise caution in reshaping the procedural law of judicial review of administrative action. I apply the set of considerations to four areas of procedural law, concluding that Canadian courts have struggled with some issues – tribunal reconsideration and tribunal standing – but have done reasonably well on others – superior court jurisdiction over federal prisons and the content of the record. Indeed, the latter provides a model for the future development of the procedural law of judicial review of administrative action by Canadian courts.

Keywords: judicial review, procedural law, tribunal standing, record, habeas corpus, jurisdiction, Federal Court, reconsideration, res judicata

Suggested Citation

Daly, Paul, Updating the Procedural Law of Judicial Review of Administrative Action (March 21, 2018). University of British Columbia Law Review (Forthcoming); University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 25/2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3145268

Paul Daly (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
142
rank
189,092
Abstract Views
391
PlumX