Hidden in Plain Sight: A More Compelling Case for Diversity

58 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2018 Last revised: 23 Mar 2019

See all articles by Jonathan Feingold

Jonathan Feingold

BruinX; UCLA Equity, Diversity and Inclusion

Date Written: March 19, 2019

Abstract

For four decades, the diversity rationale has offered a lifeline to affirmative action in higher education. Yet even after forty years, this critical feature of equal protection doctrine remains constitutionally insecure and politically fraught. Legal challenges persist, the Justice Department has launched a new assault on race-conscious admissions, and an impending shift on the Supreme Court could usher in an era of increased hostility toward the concept of diversity itself. The future of race-conscious admissions arguably hangs in the balance. In this Article, I argue that the diversity rationale’s present fragility rests, in part, on its defenders’ failure to center diversity’s most compelling quality: its ability to promote personal equality within the university. To fill this void, this Article advances the first comprehensive case for diversity rooted in each student’s interest in an equal opportunity to enjoy, regardless of race, the full benefits of university membership. This framing is appealing, in part, because it makes salient the present and personal equality harms that students of color suffer when severely under-represented in predominately White institutions. Race conscious-admissions, in turn, emerge as an essential component of institutional efforts to further normative commitments—ranging from racial integration to individual meritocracy—that should resonate with Justices across the ideological spectrum. To support this new framing, I resurrect the Supreme Court’s oft-forgotten pre-Brown desegregation cases. These decisions reinforce the constitutional infirmity of institutional conditions that compromise a student’s ability, because of her race, to access the full benefits of university membership. I then bridge the theory to social science that reveals how environmental cues—including racial demographics—can exact concrete and quantifiable burdens on students from negatively stereotyped groups. Although well-traveled in other domains, this research has only begun to inform legal scholarship.

Keywords: equal protection, diversity rationale, social science, affirmative action, race

Suggested Citation

Feingold, Jonathan, Hidden in Plain Sight: A More Compelling Case for Diversity (March 19, 2019). 2019 Utah Law Review 59. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3147950

Jonathan Feingold (Contact Author)

BruinX; UCLA Equity, Diversity and Inclusion ( email )

2255 Murphy Hall
Box 951405
Los Angeles, CA CA 90095
United States
3102067411 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://equity.ucla.edu

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
672
rank
324,985
PlumX Metrics