Comment: Artis v. District of Columbia – What Did the Court Actually Say?

8 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2018

See all articles by Doron M. Kalir

Doron M. Kalir

Cleveland State University, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Date Written: March 27, 2018

Abstract

This short comment argues, in essence, that the Dissent has failed to understand the majority opinion. As a result, the direction to lower courts, lawyers, and potential plaintiff may be lacking.

Keywords: Federal Jurisdiction, Statutory Interpretation, Tolling Period, Supreme Court Review, Justice Gorsuch

Suggested Citation

Kalir, Doron M., Comment: Artis v. District of Columbia – What Did the Court Actually Say? (March 27, 2018). Forthcoming, 94 Notre Dame L.Rev. Online _____ (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3150833

Doron M. Kalir (Contact Author)

Cleveland State University, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law ( email )

2121 Euclid Avenue, LB 138
Cleveland, OH 44115-2214
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
11
Abstract Views
115
PlumX Metrics