'Natural Born Citizen': A Response to Thomas H. Lee

67 American University Law Review Forum 15 (2018)

20 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2018 Last revised: 13 Jul 2018

John Vlahoplus

Independent

Date Written: June 28, 2018

Abstract

In "Natural Born Citizen" Thomas H. Lee provides a challenging and in his own words "novel interpretation" of the original meaning of that constitutional term. Lee analyzes a wide range of sources including American constitutional history, Anglo-American legal treatises, continental natural law theory, and four centuries of English and British statutes and political and economic history. He concludes that the original meaning of the term at the adoption of the Constitution includes foreign-born children of "U.S. citizen fathers who had resided in the United States but went abroad temporarily for a private purpose," following the natural law principle of jus sanguinis (right of blood). He considers the analysis to be important in part because it shows how to do originalism.

This Response disputes Lee's conclusion and argues that he overlooks or misinterprets important authorities including writings of the Founders, legislative history from the First Congress, the 1608 English decision in Calvin's Case, relevant portions of Blackstone's Commentaries, and the English and British statutes and cases interpreting them. It suggests that "Natural Born Citizen" represents a constructive rather than an originalist interpretation of the Constitution. Finally, it suggests that Lee's conclusion implies significant additional rights to birthright citizenship and judicial power to interpret natural law in the constitutional context. "Natural Born Citizen" may not be originalism, and it may not constrain judicial power as some intend originalism to do, but it is certainly a bold and challenging interpretation of Anglo-American legal history that merits close attention.

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Citizenship, Natural Born Citizen, Presidential Eligibility, Natural Law, Legal History, Originalism, Constitutional Interpretation, Jus Soli, Jus Sanguinis, Naturalization, Vattel

Suggested Citation

Vlahoplus, John, 'Natural Born Citizen': A Response to Thomas H. Lee (June 28, 2018). 67 American University Law Review Forum 15 (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3154894

John Vlahoplus (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
rank
347,233
Abstract Views
240
PlumX