Of Demagogues and Dictators? The Redemption of Constitutional Referenda in New Zealand

65 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2018 Last revised: 16 May 2018

See all articles by Georgia Whelan

Georgia Whelan

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni

Date Written: April 2, 2018

Abstract

Referenda have been strongly criticised in recent years. Western liberal democracies are fixated on representative democracy, with elections as the pinnacle of democratic participation. However, political apathy and voter dissatisfaction are pressing problems. This paper argues that referenda can be a democratically legitimate method for major constitutional change. The problems canvassed in the literature and witnessed in recent examples, such as “Brexit”, are merely problems of practice not principle. To redeem constitutional referenda, a comparative approach is adopted to analyse the referendum methods used in New Zealand, Australia, Ireland, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. From this assessment, a model provision is developed that should guide the process for any major constitutional referendum in New Zealand. It injects a dose of direct, participatory and deliberative democracy into our representative system, thereby improving the democratic legitimacy of constitutional referenda.

Keywords: referenda, constitutional referendum, democracy, legitimacy, constitutional change

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Whelan, Georgia, Of Demagogues and Dictators? The Redemption of Constitutional Referenda in New Zealand (April 2, 2018). Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, Student/Alumni Paper No. 9/2018.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3154912

Georgia Whelan (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, Victoria 6140
New Zealand

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
15
Abstract Views
73
PlumX Metrics