Text Messages Are Property: Why You Don't Own Your Text Messages, But It'd Be a Lot Cooler If You Did

55 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2018 Last revised: 9 Sep 2019

See all articles by Spence Howden

Spence Howden

Washington and Lee University - School of Law, Students

Date Written: March 2, 2018

Abstract

Courts have yet to consider whether text messages are property, but they will soon. As our lives become more and more centered around our smartphones, text messages will displace e-mails as the primary means of electronic communication (if that hasn’t already happened). We currently don’t have an effective means of recourse available should our cellular providers purposefully block or delete our text messages.

The answer lies in property law. This Note argues that text messages are intangible personal property, which leads to two practical outcomes.

First, text message “owners” can successfully sue using property‑based causes of action (e.g., trespass to chattels and conversion) when their ownership rights over their text messages are disturbed by the service provider or cell phone manufacturer. Although there have been few legal challenges brought by aggrieved text message owners, they have been universally unsuccessful in causing cellular providers to change their ways. Had these aggrieved text message owners sued under a property-based cause of action, they would have successfully enjoined the cellular providers from continuing to mess with their text messages.

Second, a judicial determination that text messages constitute intangible personal property will close the third-party loophole. As it stands, the government is free to search the contents of our text messages because we have voluntarily conveyed the information to our cellular service providers. However, if courts find that text messages constitute a form of property, an encrypted text message starts to look more and more like a sealed letter than public information. The framers designed the Fourth Amendment to prevent unwarranted searches and seizures of the dominant form of communication of their day: sealed letters. Consequently, it only makes sense to extend the Fourth Amendment’s protection to the dominant form of communication today: encrypted text messages.

Keywords: text messages, text message law, privacy law, property law, intangible property, intangible personal property, digital property, virtual property, cybertrespass, trespass to chattels, conversion, imessage, apple, android, fourth amendment, warrantless search, third-party exception

Suggested Citation

Howden, Spence, Text Messages Are Property: Why You Don't Own Your Text Messages, But It'd Be a Lot Cooler If You Did (March 2, 2018). 76 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1073 (2019), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3157359

Spence Howden (Contact Author)

Washington and Lee University - School of Law, Students ( email )

204 W Washington St
Lexington, VA
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
Abstract Views
1,395
rank
212,129
PlumX Metrics