The South African Statutory Derivative Action: Background, Comparisons and Application

Posted: 9 Apr 2018

See all articles by Jean Du Plessis

Jean Du Plessis

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School

Date Written: September 28, 2017

Abstract

This essay focuses on the statutory derivative action under South African law, with some comparative notes. The former statutory derivative action in South Africa ( contained in section 266 of the Companies Act 61 of 1973) is explained as well as the current section 165 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. Some comparative notes have been added to illustrate that there are several similarities, but also significant differences between the Australian and South African statutory derivative actions. The leading case of the Supreme Court of Appeal, Mbethe v United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd, is discussed as example of the application of section 165. There is a particular focus on the onus of proof for applicants and the 'good faith' requirement of section 165. This essay concludes that, based on the Mbethe case, section 165 has the potential to be an effective remedy for the parties who have standing to bring such actions. However, the discretion of the court, in granting or refusing leave for a statutory derivative action to be instituted, provides a good safeguard against frivolous and vexatious actions.

Keywords: statutory derivative, South Africa, SACA

Suggested Citation

Du Plessis, Jean, The South African Statutory Derivative Action: Background, Comparisons and Application (September 28, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3157370

Jean Du Plessis (Contact Author)

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School ( email )

221 Burwood Highway
Burwood
Burwood, Victoria 3125, Victoria 3125
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
532
PlumX Metrics