Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin's Case (1608)

74 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 73 (1997)

74 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2018

See all articles by Polly J. Price

Polly J. Price

Emory University School of Law

Date Written: January 15, 1997

Abstract

This article examines Calvin's Case (1608), a King's Bench decision about whether a person born in Scotland after the union of the Scottish and English crowns in 1603 was also a subject of England. American judges in the nineteenth century used Coke's report of Calvin's Case to determine questions of US citizenship, and in doing so produced a common law of territorial birthright citizenship. American judges equated the ancient English term "subject" with "citizen," without discussion of the perplexing issues of sovereignty that had occupied the King's Bench. This article describes the dilemma in Calvin's Case and the various sources available to resolve it, including the European civil law's distinction between rules of jus soli and jus sanguinis.

Keywords: citizenship, birthright citizenship, aliens, subjects, jus soli, jus sanguinis, Calvin's Case, precedent, citizenship by birth

Suggested Citation

Price, Polly J., Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin's Case (1608) (January 15, 1997). 74 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 73 (1997), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3157386

Polly J. Price (Contact Author)

Emory University School of Law ( email )

1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-7869 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
339
Abstract Views
2,778
Rank
189,129
PlumX Metrics