Constructing and Contesting Structural Inequality

Critical Analysis of Law 5.1 (2018)

28 Pages Posted: 3 May 2018

Date Written: April 16, 2018


Many forms of economic, social, and political inequality are the product not of individual actors but rather of larger systemic and structural arrangements. How should we conceptualize and then respond to such structural inequalities? This paper highlights two areas of current debate in legal scholarship and public policy: the changing nature of work and urban inequality. Each of these areas of debate provides examples of how law and policy construct structural forms of inequality—and how such inequality can be contested. As this paper suggests, structural inequality is best understood as an aggregate, cumulative product of legal and policy decisions. Such structural inequality requires similarly structural remedies that go beyond incremental, “meliorist” approaches. Specifically, the paper suggests three strategies for redressing structural inequality: limits on private power, investments in public goods, and oversight and enforcement by administrative agencies.

Keywords: inequality, structure, law, political economy

Suggested Citation

Rahman, K. Sabeel, Constructing and Contesting Structural Inequality (April 16, 2018). Critical Analysis of Law 5.1 (2018), Available at SSRN:

K. Sabeel Rahman (Contact Author)

Brooklyn Law School ( email )

250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics