Explaining International Acts

25 Pages Posted: 1 May 2018 Last revised: 4 Sep 2019

See all articles by Chimène Keitner

Chimène Keitner

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Date Written: April 18, 2018


This contribution to a symposium on Evan Criddle & Evan Fox-Decent’s “Fiduciaries of Humanity” pushes against the strong claim by some critics that international legal norms are concerned solely with outcomes, rather than with processes of deliberation and justification more commonly associated with certain areas of domestic law. It explores this proposition by looking at examples including the 1999 Kosovo intervention, the April 2018 Syria strikes, and the results of the Chilcot Inquiry in the United Kingdom. Although deliberative processes that lead to international acts may not be judicially reviewable to the same extent as those that lead to purely domestic acts, the push for “transparency” among domestic constituencies, as well as other oversight mechanisms, create ex ante incentives for integrity in decision-making processes and rationales in the conduct of foreign affairs. In addition, ex post explanations of international acts may themselves carry legal significance as expressions of a state’s opinio juris. Scholars and practitioners should not discount the “culture of justification” that exists at the international level, even outside international courts and tribunals.

Keywords: culture of justification, international law, humanitarian intervention, Chilcot Inquiry, Kosovo, Security Council

Suggested Citation

Keitner, Chimène, Explaining International Acts (April 18, 2018). McGill Law Journal, Forthcoming; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 285. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3165148

Chimène Keitner (Contact Author)

University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics