Listeners' Choices

46 Pages Posted: 2 May 2018 Last revised: 9 May 2018

Date Written: April 20, 2018

Abstract

Speech is a matching problem. Speakers choose listeners, and listeners choose speakers. When their choices conflict, law often decides who speaks to whom. The pattern is clear: First Amendment doctrine consistently honors listeners’ choices for speech. When willing and unwilling listeners’ choices conflict, the willing listeners win. And when competing speakers’ choices conflict, listeners’ choices among them break the tie. This essay provides a theoretical framework for analyzing speech problems in terms of speakers’ and listeners’ choices, an argument for the centrality of listener choice to any coherent theory of free speech, and supporting examples from First Amendment caselaw.

Keywords: free speech, First Amendment, listeners, matching

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Grimmelmann, James, Listeners' Choices (April 20, 2018). University of Colorado Law Review, Forthcoming; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-34. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3166138

James Grimmelmann (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Cornell Tech ( email )

111 8th Avenue #302
New York, NY 10011
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
229
PlumX Metrics