Post-Enron Reflections on Comparative Corporate Governance
20 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2002
Date Written: June 6, 2002
Abstract
In the heated debate of the last fifteen years over which of the world's many different corporate governance systems were best, the shareholder primacy advocates thought they had won at the turn of the century. Now, in 2002, the helium has come out of the formerly high-flying technology and information infrastructure sectors that were leading the U.S. economic expansion in the 1990s, and the Enron fiasco and accounting scandals at numerous other U.S. corporations have exposed deep flaws in the system that had been held up as the model for all the world to follow. Many possible lessons can be drawn. At least one is that the high-powered incentives provided by stock option compensation may produce perverse behavior that can, in turn, undermine institutional arrangements that support and foster mutual trust and cooperation. The study of corporate governance must focus on more than just how to get management to maximize value for shareholders. It must also be about the human institutions that bind people together in cooperative relationships over long periods of time.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Ans Kolk
-
Deviant or Different? Corporate Governance in Japan and Germany
By Ronald Dore
-
Legal Reform and Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors in Japan
By Takaya Seki
-
Japan's Paradoxical Response to the New 'Global Standard' in Corporate Governance
By John Buchanan and Simon Deakin
-
Japan's Paradoxical Response to the New 'Global Standard' in Corporate Governance
By John Buchanan and Simon Deakin
-
CSR Performance in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Mexico
By Alan Muller and Ans Kolk