Estimating the Impact on Poverty of Ghana's Fuel Subsidy Reform and a Mitigating Response

PEP working paper serie 2014-02

35 Pages Posted: 9 May 2018 Last revised: 12 Jul 2018

See all articles by Edgar Francis Cooke

Edgar Francis Cooke

Ashesi University

Sarah Hague

United Nations - Ghana Office

John Cockburn

Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP); Université Laval; Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP)

AbdelRahmen El Lahga

Institut Supérieur de Gestion (Tunisia)

Luca Tiberti

Université Laval

Date Written: January 1, 2014

Abstract

Governments across Africa have faced increasing challenges to maintain fuel subsidies over recent years. In Ghana, in the face of a near 12% fiscal deficit in 2012, their burgeoning cost has drawn attention to questions of fiscal sustainability as well as their overall efficiency and effectiveness. In 2013, the Ghanaian Government would have spent cost 2.4 billion GHS (approximately 1.2 billion USD) on fuel subsidies, equaling 3.2% of GDP and more than half of Ghana’s allocation to the entire education sector. Fuel subsidies around the world have been proven to be generally regressive, benefiting largely the richest group with very little reaching those living below the poverty line. In Ghana, this paper finds that almost 78% of fuel subsidies benefited the wealthiest group, with less than 3% of subsidy benefits reaching the poorest quintile.The richest quintile of the population received 15.86 GHS per year from the fuel subsidies per capita, while the poorest received just 2.23 GHS per capita. In early 2013 the Ghanaian Government introduced the removal of fuel subsidies over the first half of the year. Prices of petrol, kerosene, diesel and LPG saw rises of between 15% and 50%, until prices reached their market level in mid-September 2013. Following the subsidy removal and before the 2013 budget was finalised, the Government welcomed the initiation of this research in order to assess the impact of the reform on the poor and to ensure a mitigating response in the form of a social safety net. Based on recent studies of social protection in Ghana this paper identifies the national cash transfer programme, LEAP, as being well targeted, having positive impact, and functioning at national scale with immediate plans for expansion. This report builds on UNICEF technical support to reform fuel subsidies and scale-up social protection to respond to rising inequality. It aims to provide evidence of the magnitude and the distribution of the impacts of the 2013 fuel subsidy reforms on household welfare in Ghana, and to determine to what extent an expansion of social protection, through the LEAP cash transfer programme, is an effective mitigating measure.

Suggested Citation

Cooke, Edgar Francis and Hague, Sarah and Cockburn, John and El Lahga, AbdelRahmen and Tiberti, Luca, Estimating the Impact on Poverty of Ghana's Fuel Subsidy Reform and a Mitigating Response (January 1, 2014). PEP working paper serie 2014-02. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3167429 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167429

Edgar Francis Cooke

Ashesi University ( email )

1 University Avenue
Berekuso, Eastern Region
Ghana

Sarah Hague (Contact Author)

United Nations - Ghana Office ( email )

PO Box 5051
Accra
Ghana

John Cockburn

Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP) ( email )

P.O. Box 30772-00100
ICIPE - Duduville Campus, Kasarani
Nairobi
Kenya

Université Laval ( email )

Dept. of Economics
Québec, Quebec G1V 0A6
Canada

Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP) ( email )

Duduville Campus, Kasarani
P.O. Box 30772-00100
Nairobi
Kenya

AbdelRahmen El Lahga

Institut Supérieur de Gestion (Tunisia) ( email )

45 Rue de la Liberte, Cite Bouchoucha
Bardo, Tunis 2000
Tunisia

Luca Tiberti

Université Laval ( email )

2214 Pavillon J-A. DeSeve
Quebec, Quebec G1K 7P4
Canada

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
18
Abstract Views
151
PlumX Metrics