Complementarity in Bond Design

50 Pages Posted: 10 May 2018 Last revised: 15 Apr 2019

See all articles by Robert L. Kieschnick

Robert L. Kieschnick

University of Texas at Dallas

Malcolm Wardlaw

University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business; University of Texas at Dallas - School of Management - Department of Finance & Managerial Economics

Date Written: March 21, 2019

Abstract

This study examines the joint choice of bond features that corporations make in defining their bonds. Using data on new corporate bond issues from 1990 through 2012, we find that corporate bonds are packages of different provisions and restrictions reflecting complementarities between bond features that change with issuer characteristics. Broadly, we find evidence that asymmetries of information between issuer and investors, agency conflicts between stockholders and bondholders, credit risk, the nature of the firm’s growth prospects, and bond market conditions all play a role in the use or non-use of different corporate bond features.

Keywords: bonds, bond design, covenants

JEL Classification: G12, G19, G32, G39

Suggested Citation

Kieschnick, Robert L. and Wardlaw, Malcolm, Complementarity in Bond Design (March 21, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3167967 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167967

Robert L. Kieschnick

University of Texas at Dallas ( email )

800 W. Campbell Rd, SM31
Richardson, TX 75080
United States
972-883-6273 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.utdallas.edu/~rkiesch/

Malcolm Wardlaw (Contact Author)

University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business ( email )

701 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI MI 48109
United States

University of Texas at Dallas - School of Management - Department of Finance & Managerial Economics ( email )

2601 North Floyd Road
P.O. Box 830688
Richardson, TX 75083
United States
972-883-5903 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
252
PlumX Metrics