Coping with Chevron: Justice Gorsuch's Majority and Justice Breyer's Dissent in SAS Institute
36 Yale J. on Reg.: Notice & Comment (Apr. 25, 2018)
4 Pages Posted: 10 May 2018
Date Written: April 25, 2018
Abstract
Neither Justice Breyer nor Justice Gorsuch are fond of the "mandatory," two-step approach to Chevron. Both justices have besmirched Chevron as an affront to judicial independence—an impermissible delegation of interpretive authority to executive agencies. This Post examines the two justices' differing approaches to Chevron in SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu.
Keywords: Administrative Law, Supreme Court, Chevron, SAS Institute, Patent Law, Inter Partes Review, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Bednar, Nicholas, Coping with Chevron: Justice Gorsuch's Majority and Justice Breyer's Dissent in SAS Institute (April 25, 2018). 36 Yale J. on Reg.: Notice & Comment (Apr. 25, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3169270
Register to save articles to
your library
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.
