Administrative Law Without Courts

21 Pages Posted: 26 Apr 2018 Last revised: 1 Oct 2018

See all articles by Christopher J. Walker

Christopher J. Walker

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

Date Written: April 26, 2018


As part of the UCLA Law Review’s Symposium on The Safeguards of Our Constitutional Republic, this Article argues that it is a mistake to fixate on courts as the core safeguard in the modern administrative state. So much of administrative law happens without courts. Put differently, federal agencies regulate us in many meaningful, and sometimes frightening, ways that either evade judicial review entirely or are at least substantially insulated from such review. This Article surveys the phenomenon. It sketches out seven categories of such agency action, drawing on examples from both the Obama and Trump Administrations and highlighting some of the relevant scholarship. The Article concludes with a few observations concerning the implications of administrative law without courts for administrative law theory and doctrine and a call for more scholarly attention.

Keywords: administrative law, judicial review, agency guidance, enforcement, rulemaking, agency adjudication, legislative drafting, appropriations, Chevron deference

Suggested Citation

Walker, Christopher J., Administrative Law Without Courts (April 26, 2018). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 65, pp. 1620-1640, 2018, Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 446, Available at SSRN:

Christopher J. Walker (Contact Author)

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )

55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-247-1898 (Phone)


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics