Juridical Law as a Categorical Imperative

M. E. Newhouse, “Juridical Law as a Categorical Imperative” in Ruhi Demiray & Alice Pinheiro Walla (eds), Reason, Rights and Law: New Essays on Kantian Philosophy, (University of Wales Press 2020), pp. 105-125.

15 Pages Posted: 23 May 2018 Last revised: 20 Apr 2020

See all articles by M.E. Newhouse

M.E. Newhouse

University of Surrey School of Law

Date Written: May 1, 2018

Abstract

In Kant's legal and political writings, juridical laws are supposed to be categorical imperatives: unconditional rational requirements. But how can a statute passed by a legislative body generate an unconditional rational requirement for us to obey? I argue that Kant was right: juridical laws enacted by legislatures are categorical imperatives, and the external incentives that the state links to its legal commands (i.e. threatened punishments) play a critical role in making them so. Indeed, statutory commands must be categorical imperatives if they are to establish juridical laws, and statutes that fail to establish juridical laws do not obligate us to obey their terms.

Keywords: Kant, legal obligation, philosophy of law

Suggested Citation

Newhouse, Marie, Juridical Law as a Categorical Imperative (May 1, 2018). M. E. Newhouse, “Juridical Law as a Categorical Imperative” in Ruhi Demiray & Alice Pinheiro Walla (eds), Reason, Rights and Law: New Essays on Kantian Philosophy, (University of Wales Press 2020), pp. 105-125.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3171839

Marie Newhouse (Contact Author)

University of Surrey School of Law ( email )

United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
141
Abstract Views
1,499
rank
220,613
PlumX Metrics