Non-competes, Business Dynamism, and Concentration: Evidence from a Florida Case Study
Searle Center Working Paper Series (2017-046)
52 Pages Posted: 25 May 2018 Last revised: 20 Jun 2019
Date Written: May 29, 2019
We investigate the impact of non-compete enforcement on the distribution of firm size and employment growth and business concentration by focusing on Florida’s 1996 legislative change that eased restrictions on the enforcement of non-competes. We first establish the contrast between legal regimes and that wage trends did not change before and after the passage of the legislation. Difference-in-differences models show that following the change, establishments of large firms were more likely to enter Florida; they also created a greater proportion of jobs and increased their share of employment in the state. Entrepreneurs or establishments of small firms, in contrast, were less likely to enter Florida following the law change; they also created a smaller proportion of new jobs and decreased their share of employment. Consistent with these location and job creation dynamics, a variety of business concentration measures increased following the law change in Florida. Border counties in Florida exhibit stronger effects and nationwide cross-sections demonstrate consistent correlations between state-level non-compete enforcement and the employment, size, and concentration dynamics illustrated in Florida.
Keywords: Business Dynamism; Employee Mobility, Entrepreneurship; Firm Sorting; Non-compete Agreement; Business Concentration
JEL Classification: J61, L22, L26, M13, M51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation