Equalitarianism: A Source of Liberal Bias

99 Pages Posted: 22 May 2018 Last revised: 24 May 2021

See all articles by Bo Winegard

Bo Winegard

Florida State University

Cory Clark

Florida State University; University of Pennsylvania

Connor R. Hasty

Florida State University

Roy Baumeister

Florida State University - College of Arts & Sciences

Date Written: May 8, 2018

Abstract

Recent scholarship has challenged the long-held assumption in the social sciences that
Conservatives are more biased than Liberals, yet little work deliberately explores domains of liberal bias. Here, we demonstrate that Liberals are particularly prone to bias about victims’ groups (e.g. Blacks, women) and identify a set of beliefs that consistently predict this bias, termed Equalitarianism. Equalitarianism, we believe, stems from an aversion to inequality and a desire to protect relatively low status groups, and includes three interrelated beliefs: (1) demographic groups do not differ biologically; (2) prejudice is ubiquitous and explains existing group disparities; (3) society can, and should, make all groups equal in society. This leads to bias against information that portrays a perceived privileged group more favorably than a perceived victims’ group. Eight studies (n=3,274) support this theory. Liberalism was associated with perceiving certain groups as victims (Studies 1a-1b). In Studies 2-7 and meta-analyses, Liberals evaluated the same study as less credible when the results concluded that a privileged group (men and Whites) had a more desirable quality relative to a victims’ group (women and Blacks) than vice versa. Ruling out alternative explanations of Bayesian (or other normative) reasoning, significant order effects in within-subjects designs in Studies 6 and 7 suggest that Liberals believe they should not evaluate identical information differently depending on which group is portrayed more favorably, yet do so. In all studies, higher equalitarianism mediated the relationship between more liberal ideology and lower credibility ratings when privileged groups were said to score higher on a socially valuable trait. Although not predicted a priori, meta- analyses also revealed Moderates to be the most balanced in their judgments. These findings indicate nothing about whether this bias is morally justifiable, only that it exists.

Keywords: political psychology, political bias, liberal bias, motivated cognition, egalitarianism

Suggested Citation

Winegard, Bo and Clark, Cory and Hasty, Connor R. and Baumeister, Roy, Equalitarianism: A Source of Liberal Bias (May 8, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3175680 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175680

Bo Winegard

Florida State University ( email )

Tallahasse, FL 32306
United States

Cory Clark (Contact Author)

Florida State University ( email )

Tallahasse, FL 32306
United States

University of Pennsylvania ( email )

Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Connor R. Hasty

Florida State University

Tallahasse, FL 32306
United States

Roy Baumeister

Florida State University - College of Arts & Sciences ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
7,831
Rank
342,105
PlumX Metrics