Betting on Climate Policy: Using Prediction Markets to Address Global Warming

U.C. Davis Law Review, Vol. 52, 2019, pp. 1429-1486

Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-26

59 Pages Posted: 25 May 2018 Last revised: 9 Feb 2019

See all articles by Gary Lucas, Jr.

Gary Lucas, Jr.

Texas A&M University School of Law

Felix Mormann

Texas A&M University School of Law; Stanford Law School

Date Written: May 15, 2018

Abstract

Global warming, sea level rise, and extreme weather events have made climate change a top priority for policymakers across the globe. But which policies are best suited to tackle the enormous challenges presented by our changing climate? This Article proposes that policymakers turn to prediction markets to answer that crucial question. Prediction markets have a strong track record of outperforming other forecasting mechanisms across a wide range of contexts – from predicting election outcomes and economic trends to guessing Oscar winners. In the context of climate change, market participants could, for example, bet on important climate outcomes conditioned on the adoption of particular policies. These prediction markets would aggregate policy-relevant information from a variety of sources to improve upon existing decision-making methods, including expert deliberation, peer review, and cost-benefit analysis. Prediction markets also have the potential to overcome resistance to climate change mitigation efforts, particularly among market-oriented conservatives. We explain how both the federal and state governments could use prediction markets to help resolve high-profile controversies, such as how best to allocate subsidies to promote clean technology innovation and which policy strategy promises the greatest reduction in carbon emissions.

Keywords: climate change, decision making, cost-benefit analysis, prediction markets, heuristics, bias, green subsidies, ARPA-E, feed-in tariffs, renewable portfolio standards, net metering, carbon tax, cap-and-trade

JEL Classification: D40, D62, E60, F01, H30, H51, H60, H70, K23, K32, L10, M13, O10, O32, O38, Q20, Q28, Q40, Q42, Q48

Suggested Citation

Lucas, Jr., Gary and Mormann, Felix, Betting on Climate Policy: Using Prediction Markets to Address Global Warming (May 15, 2018). U.C. Davis Law Review, Vol. 52, 2019, pp. 1429-1486, Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-26, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3178337

Gary Lucas, Jr.

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

Felix Mormann (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

Stanford Law School ( email )

Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
2,243
Rank
338,002
PlumX Metrics