The Attorneys are Bound and the Witnesses are Gagged: State Limits on Post-Conviction Investigation in Criminal Cases

68 Pages Posted: 29 May 2018

See all articles by Kathryn Miller

Kathryn Miller

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Date Written: February 1, 2018

Abstract

This Article is the first to take a comprehensive look at the ways in which State actors restrict post-conviction investigations in criminal cases, especially capital cases. By examining these restrictions in the context of interviews with jurors, victims, and State witnesses, this Article reveals that they harm criminal defendants and fail to achieve stated policy goals. The Article then examines why traditional legal arguments against these restrictions have failed, and ultimately makes the case for a constitutional right to investigate state post-conviction proceedings, grounded in the fundamental fairness prong of the Due Process Clause.

Keywords: post-conviction, habeas, collateral appeal, due process, jury, jurors, victims, death penalty, capital punishment, investigation, mitigation, interview, state interference, limitations, barriers

Suggested Citation

Miller, Kathryn, The Attorneys are Bound and the Witnesses are Gagged: State Limits on Post-Conviction Investigation in Criminal Cases (February 1, 2018). California Law Review, Vol. 106, No. 135, 2018; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3179720

Kathryn Miller (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )

360 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.berkeley.edu/our-faculty/faculty-profiles/kathryn-miller/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
68
rank
328,868
Abstract Views
279
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information