Kolber's Teaser

2018 University of Illinois Law Review Online

7 Pages Posted: 29 May 2018

See all articles by Stephen Galoob

Stephen Galoob

University of Tulsa College of Law

Date Written: April 30, 2018

Abstract

This paper responds to Adam Kolber's Punishment and Moral Risk. An ambitious reading of Kolber's thesis is that restributivist theories of punishment are untenable in light of normative uncertainty. In support of this thesis, Kolber offers a novel argument that resembles a "teaser" bet.

I first describe Kolber's teaser strategy, then argue that it does not provide a compelling internal critique of retributivism. First, Kolber's argument suffers from a methodological problem (first identified by Larry Solum): the specific propositions that Kolber tasks the retributivist with resolving are not independent of each other. Therefore, the teaser gambit is inapt.

Second, Kolber's teaser strategy ignores what seems to be the most compelling line of response from retributivists, one based on what (after Rawls) I call the "normative division of labor." Therefore, Kolber's teaser gambit fails to provide a compelling internal critique of retributivism.

Suggested Citation

Galoob, Stephen, Kolber's Teaser (April 30, 2018). 2018 University of Illinois Law Review Online . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3179848

Stephen Galoob (Contact Author)

University of Tulsa College of Law ( email )

3120 E. Fourth Place
Tulsa, OK 74104
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
82
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information