Reinsurance in America: Regulatory Regimes and Markets

Posted: 3 Jun 2018

See all articles by Robert E. Wright

Robert E. Wright

Central Michigan University - Department of Economics; Central Michigan University - Department of Economics

Date Written: May 21, 2018

Abstract

Despite possessing one of the largest and most important economies in the world for two centuries, the United States until recently was noted more for its securities markets than its banks, a fact generally attributed to regulatory rules, like unit banking and the separation of commercial and investment banking, that favored small banks. U.S. regulatory regimes also appear to have created a preference for alternative risk transfer mechanisms (ARTM), including risk markets, over the creation of large, domestic reinsurance companies. This paper explores that hypothesis by examining the history of reinsurance and reinsurers in the U.S. since the nineteenth century using both archival and printed primary sources and concludes that where large, domestic reinsurers are blocked by costly regulations, direct writers will turn to alternative forms of sharing risks, including ARTM and foreign and reciprocal reinsurance.

Keywords: Financial History, Insurance History, Reinsurance, Alternative Risk Transfer Mechanisms, Insurance Regulation

JEL Classification: G22, G28, N21, N22

Suggested Citation

Wright, Robert Eric, Reinsurance in America: Regulatory Regimes and Markets (May 21, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3182480 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3182480

Robert Eric Wright (Contact Author)

Central Michigan University - Department of Economics ( email )

Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
United States

Central Michigan University - Department of Economics ( email )

Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
690
PlumX Metrics