Acts Like a Lawyer, Talks Like a Lawyer...Non-Lawyer Advocates Representing Parties in Dispute Resolution

NYSBA New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer | Spring 2018 | Vol. 11 | No. 1

St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-0011

4 Pages Posted: 21 May 2018

Date Written: Spring 2018

Abstract

The Ethical Issue:

What are the ethical implications for lawyer mediators, arbitrators and dispute resolution providers when the lines between the roles of lawyers and the non-lawyers who are representing clients in dispute resolution become blurry? Traditionally, non-lawyer advocates (hereinafter NARs) have represented clients in the negotiations, mediation and arbitration of legal matters without cause for concern. Yes, labor union representatives, sports agents, and special education advocates are three familiar examples of non-lawyers who represent clients in negotiations, mediations and arbitrations, informing clients of their legal rights. Routinely, the lawyers and neutrals presiding over the dispute resolution procedure have warmly welcomed these non-lawyers, viewing these non-lawyers as valued participants who provide their clients beneficial subject matter expertise to help resolve the legal dispute at hand. However, that welcome has now turned tepid and tentative as FINRA and its neutrals question the ethics of some of those non-lawyers who are representing clients in FINRA arbitration.

The FINRA-NAR issue is actually a reflection of a broader problem: How do we ensure access to justice for all? For many, the escalating costs of retaining lawyers presents a barrier in their quest to access justice. In lieu of lawyers, some are seeking a more affordable alternative and are turning to NARs. This topic calls into question whether we truly believe in the clients’ right to self-determination in which they are free to choose their own representative when participating in a dispute resolution procedure or whether we adopt a more maternalistic stance, believing clients need to be protected when selecting a representative.

We are also forced to confront the limitations of access to justice for all and the remedies we are willing to support to right this egregious wrong. Yes, this problem is also entrenched in the politics of maintaining the exclusivity of the legal profession. Ultimately, however, this issue forces us to personally consider as lawyer mediators and arbitrators what it means to us to maintain a dispute resolution procedure of integrity.

Keywords: ethics, non lawyers, unauthorized practice of law, access to justice

Suggested Citation

Greenberg, Elayne E., Acts Like a Lawyer, Talks Like a Lawyer...Non-Lawyer Advocates Representing Parties in Dispute Resolution (Spring 2018). NYSBA New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer | Spring 2018 | Vol. 11 | No. 1, St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-0011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3182563 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3182563

Elayne E. Greenberg (Contact Author)

St. John's University School of Law ( email )

8000 Utopia Parkway
Queens, NY 11439
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.stjohns.edu/academics/graduate/law/academics/centers/careycenter

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
845
rank
434,701
PlumX Metrics