Police Misconduct, Video Recording, and Procedural Barriers to Rights Enforcement

51 Pages Posted: 21 May 2018

See all articles by Howard Wasserman

Howard Wasserman

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: May 21, 2018


The story of police reform has become the story of video and video evidence, and “record everything to know the truth” has become the singular mantra. Video, both police-created and citizen-created, has become the singular tool for ensuring police accountability, reforming law enforcement, and enforcing the rights of victims of police misconduct. This Article explores procedural problems surrounding the use of video recording and video evidence to counter police misconduct, hold individual officers and governments accountable, and reform departmental policies, regulations, and practices. It considers four issues: (1) the mistaken belief that video can “speak for itself” and the procedural and evidentiary problems flowing from that mistaken belief; (2) the evidentiary advantages video offers police and prosecutors; (3) the effects of video on government decisions to pursue criminal charges against police officers and to settle civil rights suits alleging police misconduct; and (4) significant procedural limits on efforts to enforce a First Amendment right to record, such as qualified immunity and standing.

Suggested Citation

Wasserman, Howard, Police Misconduct, Video Recording, and Procedural Barriers to Rights Enforcement (May 21, 2018). 96 N.C. L. Rev. 1313 (2018); Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3182630

Howard Wasserman (Contact Author)

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )

University Park, DB 2065
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-7482 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics