US Section 301, China, and Technology Transfer: Law and Its Limitations Revisited (Again)
International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Opinion, May 23, 2018
7 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2018
Date Written: May 23, 2018
Disputes between the United States and China regarding transfer of technology and intellectual property are of long-standing.
The more economically significant elements of China's practices addressed by US complaints are not well-addressed by WTO rules. Threatened US retaliatory tariffs would violate WTO norms. Still, Robert Hudec’s approach to justified trade disobedience is relevant.
US criticism of China's industrial policy may reflect a fundamental difference in national governance models. Though different, it is not clear why China's model of engaging in detailed industrial policy planning directed towards progressive goals should be viewed as misguided.
It seems reasonable to rebalance concessions that China secured when negotiating entry to the WTO because circumstances have changed in consequence of China's remarkable economic success.
There remains space for political and economic diplomacy near and outside the boundaries of the WTO framework. However, care should be taken that bilateralism does not become the "new normal" as trade fragmentation and power politics have proven problematic in the past.
Keywords: China, US Section 301, Technology Transfer, Investment, Trade, Intellectual Property
JEL Classification: K33, F02, F21, F51, K39
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation