Texas Gulf Sulphur at Fifty - A Contemporary and Historical Perspective

18 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2018 Last revised: 26 Jan 2019

See all articles by Marc I. Steinberg

Marc I. Steinberg

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Date Written: 2018

Abstract

Fifty years ago, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided perhaps the most important case under the U.S. securities laws — Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur. This decision focused on several landmark issues, including insider trading, company disclosure obligations, and the concept of materiality. Although a number of its rulings subsequently were rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, others remain good law today. Indeed, the significance of Texas Gulf Sulphur’s analysis in large measure is evidenced by its continued vitality in the federal courts and SEC enforcement practice. From a comparative law perspective, Texas Gulf Sulphur also is an important decision. Many of the principles enunciated in that decision today have been adopted by developed securities markets outside of the United States.

Keywords: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur, insider trading, U.S. securities laws, insider trades – disclosures, materiality, price impact, secondary trading markets – company liabilities, Securities Exchange Act – Section 16

Suggested Citation

Steinberg, Marc I., Texas Gulf Sulphur at Fifty - A Contemporary and Historical Perspective (2018). SMU Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, (Summer 2018), SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 391, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3194840

Marc I. Steinberg (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
380
PlumX Metrics