Gender Equality and the Protection of Motherhood in Global Constitutionalism

Journal of Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 12(1): 151-80 (2018).

30 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2018

See all articles by Julie C. Suk

Julie C. Suk

Fordham University School of Law

Date Written: June 15, 2018

Abstract

Most of the world’s constitutions contain clauses guaranteeing sex equality, and many also extend the special protection of the state to mothers. The constitutional protection of motherhood is undertheorized and neglected in global constitutional discourse, perhaps because jurisdictions like the United States view the special protection of women as contrary to gender equality. This Essay explores the feminist meanings and possibilities of constitutional mother- hood clauses, by focusing on Germany, where they originated in 1919. While motherhood clauses have had complex relationships with a range of feminist agendas, they solidified the notion that social reproduction was a subject for constitutional lawmaking. Addressing twenty-first century gender inequalities requires a more robust engagement of women’s disproportionate burdens in social reproduction. Having opened up a constitutional discourse around the challenges of social reproduction, motherhood clauses and gender equality guarantees can drive the search for new solutions.

Keywords: feminism, comparative constitutional law, gender equality, mother-hood, women, legal history

Suggested Citation

Suk, Julie C., Gender Equality and the Protection of Motherhood in Global Constitutionalism (June 15, 2018). Journal of Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 12(1): 151-80 (2018)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3197425

Julie C. Suk (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

150 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
204
Abstract Views
1,050
Rank
275,801
PlumX Metrics